January 25th, 2012
I have read three articles in the last three days about alternatives to earning a college degree, primarily through certification of one kind or another.
The first article, from The Chronicle of Higher Education, discusses the concept of “badges” that are awarded by various websites, training companies, individuals, etc. The concept is that the badge is relatively easy to earn (to keep the learner motivated and engaged) and indicates that they have achieved a certain skill level or learning competency. At the Khan Academy, students receive a “Great Listener” badge for sitting through 30 minutes of video lectures and can earn an “Awesome Listener” badge after completing a full hour of video lectures. In addition, visitors and users of that site can earn badges indicating “Master of Algebra” or “Challenge Patches.” Similarly, MITx is a newly announced venture by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), slotted to be released in an experimental prototype version in the spring of 2012 and designed to recognize people who complete MIT’s online courses and successfully pass the tests and quizzes. MIT has an arrangement with OpenStudy to offer badges to students who are helpful in course discussions. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation has a $2 million grant to test the badge platform in education. With the Foundation’s support, The Mozilla Foundation (best known for the Firefox browser) is “building an Open Badge Infrastructure to enable the interoperability and collection of badges” which will “support badges from any issuer across the Internet.”
Both The Chronicle of Higher Education and Inside Higher Education wrote about the tenured Stanford professor who has left to form a startup, Know Labs. Sebastian Thrun and a colleague taught an artificial intelligence MOOC (Massively Open Online Course) this summer to more than 160,000 students and he plans to commercialize that type of course through the Udacity portal owned by his startup, Know Labs. Thrun’s venture will not only offer courses developed and taught by him but also by others. One of the first courses that Udacity will offer is “Building a Search Engine” which will be seven weeks in length and which will be taught by David Evans, Associate Professor of Computer Science at the University of Virginia. Thrun is betting that the word (grades/recommendation) of a highly regarded professor will win over prospective employers or current employers of students taking courses.
Richard Vedder, an economist at Ohio University, wrote an article for the Chronicle’s Innovations blog entitled “Beware: Alternative Certification is Coming.” Most of the article talks about Straighterline’s lower priced college course offerings and the announcement last week that Straighterline is offering students the opportunity to take the Educational Testing Service (ETS) iSkills test and the Council on Aid to Education’s (CAE) Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA) test (the one made famous by New York University Professor of Sociology and Education, Richard Arum and University of Virginia Assistant Professor of Sociology, Josipa Roksa in their book, Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses). Vedder also discusses the Khan Academy and MIT certification offerings. My favorite paragraph from his article relates to his discussion of the first week of beginning economics courses when professors explain the point that: “If the price of something rises a lot, people look for substitutes. Resources are scarce and they [people] maximize their utility by shifting away from high priced goods or services to the lower priced good or service.”
Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses, alternative credentialing, badges, Clayton Christensen, Collegiate Learning Assessment, cost of a degree, cost of college, Council on Aid to Education, David Evans, Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns, Education Testing Service, financing college, Inside Higher Education, iSkills test, John D and Catherine T MacArthur Foundation, Josipa Roksa, Khan Academy, Know Labs, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MITx, MOOC, New York University, Nicholas Carr, Ohio University, OpenStudy, Pew Research Center, Richard Arum, Richard Vedder, SAT test taking scandal, Sebastian Thrun, Stanford, Straighterline, the big switch, The Chronicle of Higher Education, The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the Inside Out, The Mozilla Foundation, Udacity, University of Virginia
Posted in Access and Affordability, Business of Education, Cost of a Degree, Economy, Online Education, Trends in Higher Education | No Comments »
January 23rd, 2012
Rich DeMillo has a lengthy background in academia serving as a professor at four different universities, Dean of Computing at Georgia Tech College of Computing, Director of the Computer and Computation Research Division of the National Science Foundation, and was Hewlett Packard’s first Chief Technology Officer. His latest book, Abelard to Apple: The Fate of American Colleges and Universities, developed from a five page memo that he planned to send to his colleagues about what was wrong at his university then evolved to a whitepaper in which he solicited the advice of friends and colleagues, and eventually to a book.
Unlike Clayton Christensen who writes about innovative companies as a Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School (thus making his transition to writing about innovative universities less surprising), DeMillo’s background is in engineering and computer science. His observations, however, stem from his background as a professor at a traditional “brick and mortar” school. From his position inside the hallowed halls of academia, he notes that the institutions in the middle, those between the elite institutions (top 75) and institutions that admit everyone, are the ones that are in trouble with a value proposition squeeze coming from above (elite) as well as below (business model to serve anyone or everyone at a lower price point). DeMillo stresses that modern universities are businesses (contrary to some of the myopic ideologues who insist that non-profit institutions don’t have a business model) and are competitive organizations run by smart people. Similar to Christensen, DeMillo argues that the class-oriented society and culture of higher education creates a faculty-centered model that is difficult to break out of for institutions undergoing competition for enrolled students. (For a review of Christensen’s book, Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way to World Learns, see my August 2008 blog article. To see my review of Christensen’s book, The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the Inside Out, see my August 2011 blog article.)
DeMillo states that in any market, the winners are those with competitive brands, price, or value. Brand is difficult to build for all but the elite colleges and universities, price continues to increase for almost all institutions and in most cases is becoming uncompetitive, and value is a concept seldom understood by the faculty at most institutions. Because most college presidents are promoted from the ranks of academics, they are ill-equipped to understand the importance of strategic planning and understanding competitive threats from business disruptors like creative proprietary institutions.
Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: Abelard to Apple: The Fate of American Colleges and Universities, affordability, Anya Kamenentz, Clayton Christensen, Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns, DIY U: Edupunks Edupreneurs and the Coming Transformation of Higher Education, education business models, Georgia Tech, Georgia Tech College of Computing, Harvard Business School, Hewlett Packard, higher education access, National Science Foundation, Rich DeMillo, The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the Inside Out
Posted in Access and Affordability, Book Reviews, Business of Education, Online Education, Trends in Higher Education | No Comments »
December 6th, 2011
In the past several years, online higher education has come under increased scrutiny by the federal government and policymakers. As a relatively new trend, online education has been closely examined by some, not so closely examined by others, and has a number of critics. In a recent report called “Odd Man Out: How Government Supports Private-Sector Innovation, Except in Education,” published by the American Enterprise Institute, author John Bailey notes that an acute lack of support and engagement from government agencies to the private sector in education is not only out of sync with other public-private enterprises, it is counterproductive in attempting to reform higher education.
Bailey points out that the public sector has frequently employed the expertise of private industry in various attempts to solve the nation’s problems. For example, in March 2010, President Obama reached out to private-sector businesses, agreeing to provide some $150 billion in support of those businesses developing an alternative to foreign oil. He said to the CEOs in attendance, “’Your country needs you to mount a historic effort to end, once and for all, our dependence on foreign oil…And in this difficult endeavor, in this pursuit on which I believe our future depends, our country will support you.’”
In another example, Bailey points out that the Review of US Human Spaceflight Plans Committee established by the White House Office of Space and Technology Policy recommended that NASA seek private sector assistance in developing commercial spacecraft. “The review argued that this would free NASA to focus its attention and investment on developing more advanced capabilities, particularly in deep-space exploration.” In each of these examples, a significant problem or dilemma has been acknowledged and government has rightly recognized that private sector innovation has the business agility and market understanding to propose and execute a meaningful solution.
Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: American Enterprise Institute, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, higher education reform, Investing in Innovation, John Bailey, NASA, Odd Man Out: How Government Supports Private-Sector Innovation Except in Education, President Obama, Review of US Human Spaceflight Plans Committee, rising cost of a degree, White House Office of Space and Technology Policy
Posted in Access and Affordability, Business of Education, Economy, Online Education, Trends in Higher Education | No Comments »
November 28th, 2011
The October 2011 issue of American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research’s (AEI) Education Outlook included an interesting analysis of the total cost of a bachelor’s degree titled, “Cheap for Whom?: How Much Higher Education Costs Taxpayers.” The authors, Mark Schneider and Jorge Klor de Alva, go beyond a surface analysis of tuition rates, student fees, and books. Their analysis delves deeper into the overall financial cost model to consider and analyze taxpayer subsidies as part of the cost of a bachelor’s degree.
Schneider and de Alva note that consumers are largely oblivious to the cost of an item, focusing almost solely on the price instead. As long as the price seems reasonable (or, at least comparable to other similar products), the consumer is not likely to consider what the actual cost of the product is. As the authors point out, nowhere can this be seen more clearly than in higher education. Since the downturn of the economy in 2008, a deluge of articles have been published exploring the price of a college education (see the “Impact of the Economy on Higher Education” section of this blog) but little has been written for the American public about the true cost of a degree (that data is typically buried in academic policy and research reports that typically do not receive broad media coverage). Schneider and de Alva have undertaken the daunting task of publishing the total cost of a bachelor’s degree for the American taxpayer. Their findings are notable, assuming that those in a position to influence public policy and a broader national discussion read their paper.
The authors divided their sample into the following categories: public, private not-for-profit, and private for-profit institutions. Beyond that, they used a variation of the well-known rankings reported in Barron’s Profiles in American Colleges which provides six categories for schools ranging from “noncompetitive” (open admissions schools) to “most competitive” (highly selective, elite institutions). Interestingly, American taxpayers subsidize the least competitive schools far less than they do the most competitive. The irony is that the largest and fastest growing sector of the college population includes low-income and non-traditional students who are attending the lesser competitive schools. These schools tend to offer greater flexibility for part-time students, working adults, and other “nontraditional” student populations. To provide perspective on the dramatic differences in taxpayer subsidies, consider that “among not-for-profit institutions, the amount of taxpayer subsidies hovers between $1,000 and $2,000 per student per year…” Among the most selective institutions in the nation, “the taxpayer subsidy jumps substantially to more than $13,000 per student per year.”
Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Barron's Profiles in American Colleges, Cheap for Whom?: How Much Higher Education Costs Taxpayers, completion agenda, Education Outlook, Guide for State Policymakers, Impact of the Economy on Higher Education, Jorge Klor de Alva, Lumina Foundation for Education, Mark Schneider, Obama Administration
Posted in Access and Affordability, Cost of a Degree, Economy, Financial Aid, Trends in Higher Education | No Comments »
November 11th, 2011
Today is Veterans Day, a day designed to celebrate our nation’s armed forces, their commitment, and their ultimate sacrifices. Though this day comes only once each year, the special individuals to whom it is dedicated deserve our thanks every day. The last year has been a tumultuous one for the entire world and the men and women of the American military have been engaged in various theaters of operations beyond Iraq and Afghanistan. At home and abroad, US military forces continue to provide proof of General Douglas MacArthur’s statement that, “Americans never quit.”
Our military responded to a series of natural disasters this year. In March, through Operation Tomodachi (Japanese for “friendship”) the Marines, Navy, and Air Force offered humanitarian and disaster relief assistance to the Japanese people affected by an 8.9 magnitude earthquake and tsunami that killed more than 15,000 and left millions more homeless. Marine helicopter units delivered thousands of pounds of rice, bread, and other food items to the hardest hit areas. In addition, a significant number of American naval ships responded including the USS McCampbell, the USS Curtis, the USS Mustin, and the USS Ronald Reagan.
The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) moved into action when a series of severe storms this past Spring plagued the nation’s mid-section. Tornadoes, floods, and other significant weather events left thousands in a desperate state. The USACE worked diligently to ensure the safety of structures following those storms and to assist in meeting the basic needs of those impacted by the devastation.
Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: "Americans never quit", 8.9 magnitude earthquake in Japan, Abbottabad Pakistan, Air Force, AMU, Army, Army Rangers, Coast Guard, General Douglas MacArthur, humanitarian and disaster relief assistance to Japan, Hurricane Irene, Hurricane Katrina, Libya, Marines, Muammar Gaddafi, National Guard, Navy, Navy SEALs, no-fly zone, Operation Tomodachi, Osama bin Laden, President Obama, Tomahawk cruise missiles, United Nations, US Army Corps of Engineers, USS Curtis, USS McCampbell, USS Mustin, USS Ronald Reagan, Veterans Day
Posted in Current Events, Honoring our Military, Veterans Day | No Comments »
October 26th, 2011
I read an article in the October 15, 2011 issue of The Economist entitled “Trouble in the Middle.” The article begins by stating that interest in MBA programs at American business schools peaked in 2009 and applications have fallen since then. The author states that some business schools are worried that the trend is related to more than just a slow recovering economy, but in fact a greater change.
The Economist presents data that may back the case that it’s not just the economy. In examining data accumulated in their annual ranking of the top 100 MBA programs, they note that in 2010, the average cost of an MBA for the 85 schools outside of the top 15 was $81,911 while the average starting salary for the graduates of those schools was $81,178. Five years earlier, the two year cost for the same 85 schools was $60,247 while the starting salary average was $78,442. The attached graph shows that the disparity was greater ten years ago when the average starting salary was over $80,000 and the average cost was slightly less than $50,000. The comparison could hardly be more dramatic; increasing costs of tuition have cut the noticeable advantage of attending a residential MBA program outside of the top 15.
Elite schools like Harvard still have an advantage according to The Economist’s survey data. Additionally, the article mentions a recent event at Harvard hosted by a large consulting firm where a member of that firm’s senior management noted while speaking to the faculty that the most valuable player on the Harvard Business School team was the Director of Admissions, a not so subtle reference to the elite students recruited to the school and subsequently recruited by that consulting firm.
Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: Association of Advance Collegiate Schools of Business, average pay for MBA graduate, college tuition, Harvard, Harvard Business School, MBA programs, The Economist, The Global Auction: The Broken Promises of Education Jobs and Incomes, The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the Inside Out, Trouble in the Middle
Posted in Access and Affordability, Business of Education, Economy, Trends in Higher Education | No Comments »