If Financing Higher Education Was Only that Simple
October 15th, 2009I read an editorial from the Pasadena, California Star News entitled “Higher Ed Needs a Redo.” The article discusses the premises, philosophy, and outcomes of California’s Master Plan issued in 1960 and states that it’s time for a revision to a document that is approaching 50 years old. The article mentions the 30+ percent tuition increase at the University of California and the tuition increases at the California State University System (CSU) that have reached the point where students pay more in tuition than the state pays. The writer notes that this is a long way from the original Master Plan which guaranteed a free education to anyone qualified for admission. The editorial notes that during the recession of the 1990’s, CSU’s enrollment decreased by 50,000 and it took the state years to recover. Lastly, the California House and Senate have agreed to meet to discuss a revision of the Master Plan on its 50th anniversary. The timing is fortuitous given the budget crisis.
As I read this article, seemingly the 500th that I’ve read about California’s crisis in higher education funding, it reminded me of the data available through the annual State Higher Education Finance report issued by the State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO). On August 9, 2009, SHEEO issued their sixth report which is for FY 2008. I highly recommend this report for anyone interested in understanding the funding of public higher education in America. What’s important to note about this report is that it shows positive progress in higher education (since it’s for the 2007-2008 funding year) but notes that 2009 and 2010 will probably be different given the impact of the recession. Supplementary tables are maintained by the State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO) on their website at www.sheeo.org.


